Skip to content
AI security testing for LLM apps, RAG, and agents

Test AI systems beforethey fail in production.

Red-team LLM apps, RAG systems, and AI agents for prompt injection, jailbreaks, unsafe tool use, and sensitive data leakage before release.

Built for teams shipping real AI products

Assessment Console

staging-agent-gateway / release-candidate

Continuous validation 18 active attack suites

Attack scenarios

Queued + live

Prompt injection via retrieved policy

Flagged

Role-play jailbreak escalation

Flagged

Unsafe tool-call after context override

Blocked

Sensitive system prompt leakage

Observed
Attack coverage spans prompt input, retrieved context, tool output, and multi-step agent state.

Evidence and traces

7 findings captured

Finding

Instruction override reached tool planner

High risk

A retrieved document injected an alternate system priority, causing the agent to justify a risky external action without a valid approval step.

Prompt path

User input → retrieval chunk → planner

Unsafe behavior

Tool routing changed after hostile context merge

Recommendation

Isolate retrieval instructions and re-check tool policy

14:02:18

Retrieved document attempted instruction override

critical
14:02:19

Agent selected external tool with manipulated justification

elevated
14:02:21

Hidden policy string surfaced in partial completion

critical

Current risk

72

Jailbreak and prompt-injection exposure score

Prompt injectionHigh
Tool safetyElevated
Data leakageHigh

Report package

Severity-ranked findings
Trace and tool-call evidence
Regression-ready re-test plan

Built for serious AI review

Honest trust signals for teams that care how the testing actually works.

Designed for modern LLM product teams

Security review built for teams shipping assistants, copilots, and agent workflows into real customer paths.

Built for prompt injection and agent-risk testing

Focus on instruction hierarchy, unsafe actions, tool abuse, and failure modes standard QA rarely catches.

Structured for repeatable security review

Move from one-off adversarial testing to evidence-backed regression checks before release.

Local-first and API-compatible workflows

Useful for teams validating staging systems, internal sandboxes, local models, or hosted endpoints.

The Threat Surface

LLM products fail in ways normal QA does not model.

Prompt injection, jailbreaking, unsafe tool execution, retrieval poisoning, and workflow drift create new risk paths. TESTOS is built to test the behavior layer where those failures happen.

Risk

Prompt injection

Hidden or indirect instructions override intended behavior through user input, retrieved content, or tool responses.

Risk

Jailbreaks

Safety controls degrade under adversarial phrasing, role-play, multi-turn steering, and obfuscated prompts.

Risk

Unsafe tool use

Agents can overreach permissions, take unintended actions, or execute on manipulated context without sufficient checks.

Risk

Sensitive data leakage

System prompts, secrets, internal policies, or retrieved proprietary content surface in responses when boundaries break.

Risk

Poisoned retrieval

Untrusted documents reshape answers, citations, and downstream actions inside RAG pipelines.

Risk

Workflow failure

Multi-step agents drift, recurse, skip approvals, or mis-handle escalation logic under adversarial conditions.

Platform

A security testing layer for modern AI systems.

TESTOS is positioned as a practical platform for adversarial evaluation, evidence capture, and release-gate re-testing across LLM applications, RAG workflows, and agents.

Attack library for AI systems

Run focused suites for prompt injection, jailbreaks, data exposure, tool misuse, and agent failure modes.

Repeatable red-team scenarios

Model risky user journeys, multi-turn manipulation, and adversarial document flows with structured scenarios.

Prompt injection and jailbreak evaluation

Stress the exact instruction hierarchy and refusal behavior your product depends on in production.

RAG and agent workflow testing

Validate retrieval quality, context boundaries, tool routing, side effects, and approval controls together.

Evidence capture and reporting

Keep failing prompts, traces, risk summaries, and findings organized for engineering and security review.

Release-gate regression testing

Re-test fixes on the same scenarios before release so security learning compounds instead of resetting.

How It Works

A clean path from adversarial testing to release confidence.

Keep the workflow simple: connect the surface you are shipping, run targeted attack suites, inspect the evidence, and re-test fixes before release.

01
Step 01

Connect your AI surface

Point TESTOS at a staging endpoint, model gateway, RAG workflow, or agent runtime without rebuilding your product around the tool.

02
Step 02

Run targeted attack suites

Execute tests for prompt injection, jailbreaks, risky retrieval behavior, sensitive data exposure, and unsafe tool execution.

03
Step 03

Review findings and evidence

Inspect severity, attack traces, failing prompts, tool events, and report-ready evidence that engineering teams can act on.

04
Step 04

Re-test before release

Turn key failures into repeatable checks so fixes are validated before deployment, not after an incident.

Use Cases

Security validation for the AI products teams are actually shipping.

From RAG assistants to tool-using agents, TESTOS fits the common release patterns where adversarial testing matters most.

RAG chatbot review

Stress untrusted documents, citation quality, retrieval boundaries, and hidden instruction injection inside knowledge workflows.

Customer support assistant testing

Validate refusal behavior, escalation controls, tool calls, and leakage risk in customer-facing support paths.

Internal copilot validation

Reduce exposure of secrets, internal policies, and sensitive context across enterprise or developer copilots.

AI agent workflow hardening

Test tool permissions, approval steps, retries, side effects, and instruction integrity across long-running agent flows.

Release-gate security review

Add structured adversarial evaluation before shipping new LLM features, not as a retroactive incident response measure.

Ready to ship

Ship AI with fewer blind spots.

Red-team LLM apps, RAG systems, and AI agents before users discover the weakness for you.